Progress in the implementation of measures as of
23.11.2024
1 |
20%
1 |
20%
3 |
60%
5
Implemented
In progress
Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
1 (
20%)
Measures —
5
2.3.1.2.1.
Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to amend the Customs Code of Ukraine, which would:
1) stipulate that the opinion of the right holder is sufficient to confirm a violation of intellectual property rights and draw up a report on the violation of customs rules involving the transportation of goods across the customs border of Ukraine in a manner that violates intellectual property rights;
2) expand the application of measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights to instances of detection of goods suspected of being in violation of intellectual property rights, which are moved across the border bypassing customs control, are concealed from customs control by way of avoiding declaration, etc.;
3) impose harsher administrative penalties for moving goods across the customs border of Ukraine in a manner that violates intellectual property rights;
4) add the right holder to the list of parties participating in case proceedings involving violations of customs rules under Article 476 of the Customs Code of Ukraine.
The main implementer:
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
2.3.1.2.2.
Drafting an order on amendments to the Procedure for Applying Measures Towards Greater Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and Interaction of Customs Authorities with Right Holders, Declarants, and Other Stakeholders, approved by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated June 9, 2020, No. 281, and the Procedure for Registering Objects of Intellectual Property Rights Protected Under Law in the Customs Register, approved by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated May 30, 2021, No. 648, as amended by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated June 9, 2020, No. 282, according to which:
1) the specified normative legal acts have been aligned with the amendments to the Customs Code of Ukraine indicated in subclause 2.3.1.2.1;
2) the customs authority has the right to consult the right holder during the customs inspection of goods;
3) a procedure has been instituted for responding to recurrent cases where right holders—despite having confirmed the opinion of the customs authority that the goods are suspected of being in violation of intellectual property rights—refuse (do not intend to) apply the measures towards greater protection of intellectual property right with respect to such goods or resort to other remedies provided by law;
4) an exclusively electronic form of information exchange between the customs authorities and right holders has been introduced (submitting applications to the customs register of intellectual property rights, applying measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights).
The main implementer:
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
2.3.1.2.3.
Holding a public discussion of the draft order indicated in subclause 2.3.1.2.2, and ensuring its revision (if needed), issuance, and submission for state registration
The main implementer:
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
2.3.1.2.4.
Supporting the state registration of the order indicated in subclause 2.3.1.2.2 and its official publication
The main implementer:
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
2.3.1.2.5.
Developing and putting into operation new software and IT complexes designed to:
1) ensure the traceability of actions involving the application of measures towards greater protection of intellectual property right on the part of both the customs authorities and the right holders;
2) accelerating interactions between the customs authorities and right holders by switching to information exchange in electronic form;
3) applying standardized approaches to documenting all actions and decisions involving the application of measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights, expanding the list of information accumulated in the relevant software and IT complexes with a view to broadening the opportunities for analysis, reporting, and enhancing the risk management system;
4) creating additional sources of information to be used by the customs authorities while allying measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights;
5) launching intelligent systems for analyzing the performance of the customs authorities in matters of fostering the protection of intellectual property rights and continued improvement of business processes.
The main implementer:
State Customs Service of Ukraine
Indicators —
4
Evaluation of achievement of ESR —
indicator weight —
1
The average monthly number of suspensions of customs clearance of goods in respect of which the right holder confirmed the conclusion of the customs authority that the goods are suspected of infringement of intellectual property rights is more than 100 cases.
2
The ratio of the total number of cases of application of the procedure of destruction of goods, change of labeling on goods and their packaging, the number of reports on the violation of customs rules, the number of court petitions seeking to ensure the protection of intellectual property rights, to the total number of suspensions of customs clearance of goods in respect of which the right holder has confirmed that the goods are suspected of infringement of intellectual property rights is more than 50 percent.
3
New software and IT systems aimed at improving the protection of intellectual property rights have been developed and put into operation, namely: “Data exchange between customs authorities and right holders”, “Suspension of customs clearance of goods at the initiative of the customs authority”, “Measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights”
4
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of application of measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights at customs offices as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of application of measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights at customs offices as high or very high (7 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of application of measures towards greater protection of intellectual property rights at customs offices as high or very high (4 percent).
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)