Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
2 2 2
6
Implemented In progress Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 2 ( 33.3%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 6

2.3.1.5.1. Conducting an assessment of corruption risks with the mandatory involvement of the public, particularly anticorruption NGOs and business associations

The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine

2.3.1.5.2. Drafting the anticorruption program of the State Customs Service with the mandatory involvement of the public, particularly anticorruption NGOs and business associations, and coordinating it with the public council

The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine

2.3.1.5.3. Implementing the activities prescribed by the anticorruption program indicated in subclause 2.3.1.5.2, as well as other measures towards the prevention of corruption in the customs authorities, with the mandatory involvement of the public, particularly business associations and the public council at the State Customs Service

The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine

2.3.1.5.4. Annual publication of information on the results of involvement of anticorruption NGOs and representatives of the business community

The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine

2.3.1.5.5. Annual independent anonymous survey of customs officials conducted by the public council at the State Customs Service on the performance of the customs authorities, the problematic aspects of their work, and ways to resolve the existing problems

The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine

2.3.1.5.6. Annual survey of business community representatives conducted by business associations and the public council at the State Customs Service to explore the effectiveness of their cooperation with the customs authorities, the problems encountered during their interaction, and ways to resolve them

The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine

Indicators — 4

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 30%

The State Customs Service annually publishes information about the results of engagement of anticorruption NGOs and representatives of the business community, including the list of proposals of the public for the anticorruption programs, which have been considered or rejected (with a substantiation of the reasons for the rejection), and the list and results of activities conducted during the implementation of the anticorruption program carried out with the participation of the public and representatives of the business community.

2
0 / 30%

Beginning with 2024, a report is annually published on the results of the annual independent anonymous survey of customs officials conducted by the public council at the State Customs Service on the performance of the customs authorities, the problematic aspects of their work, and ways to resolve the existing problems.

3
0 / 30%

Beginning with 2024, a report is annually published on the results of the annual survey of business community representatives conducted by business associations and the public council at the State Customs Service to explore the effectiveness of their cooperation with the customs authorities, the problems encountered during their interaction, and ways to resolve them.

4
0 / 10%

the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of cooperation between the State Customs Service and the community and business associations in developing and implementing measures towards prevention of corruptions in customs authorities as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of cooperation between the State Customs Service and the community and business associations in developing and implementing measures towards prevention of corruptions in customs authorities as high or very high (7 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of cooperation between the State Customs Service and the community and business associations in developing and implementing measures towards prevention of corruptions in customs authorities as high or very high (4 percent).

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)