Expected strategic result 2.3.3.2. The mechanism for bringing customs officials to disciplinary liability (including dismissal) is effective and transparent
Measures — 4
2.3.3.2.1.
Drafting an organizational administrative act (order) that:
1) obligates the State Customs Service to publish on a quarterly basis the results of the work of disciplinary committees formed at the State Customs Service and in the customs authorities, in a breakdown by customs authorities, the number of cases examined, the kinds of recommended decisions, the number and kinds of decisions made by officials to impose a disciplinary penalty on a civil servant or discontinue the disciplinary proceeding;
2) obligates the State Customs Service to conduct annual monitoring of the results of review of disciplinary complaints against actions officials and other employees of the customs authorities, followed by publication and public discussion of the results of such monitoring
The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine
2.3.3.2.2. Quarterly publication of the results of the work of disciplinary committees formed at the State Customs Service and in customs authorities pursuant to the order indicated in subclause 2.3.3.2.1
The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine
2.3.3.2.3. Monitoring the results of the review of disciplinary complaints against actions of officials and other employees of the customs authorities pursuant to the order indicated in subclause 2.3.3.2.1
The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine
2.3.3.2.4. Publicly discussing the results of the monitoring pursuant to the order indicated in subclause 2.3.3.2.1
The main implementer: State Customs Service of Ukraine
Indicators — 3
An organizational administrative act of the State Customs Service has been approved, which:
a) obligates the State Customs Service to publish on a quarterly basis the results of the work of disciplinary committees formed at the State Customs Service and in the customs authorities, in a breakdown by customs authorities, the number of cases examined, the kinds of recommended decisions, the number and kinds of decisions made by officials to impose a disciplinary penalty on a civil servant or discontinue the disciplinary proceeding (25 percent);
b) obligates the State Customs Service to conduct annual monitoring of the results of review of disciplinary complaints against actions officials and other employees of the customs authorities, followed by publication and public discussion of the results of such monitoring (25 percent);
The results of the work of disciplinary committees and the results of monitoring of the outcomes of review of disciplinary complaints against actions of officials and other employees of the customs authorities have been published, a public discussion of the results of such monitoring has been held within the timeframe prescribed by the act indicated in subclause 1 of clause 2.3.3.2.
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanism used to impose disciplinary liability on officials and other employees of the customs authorities as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanism used to impose disciplinary liability on officials and other employees of the customs authorities as high or very high (7 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanism used to impose disciplinary liability on officials and other employees of the customs authorities as high or very high (4 percent).