Expected strategic result 1.1.4.2. Anticorruption officers have, share, and implement understandable and effective standards of work developed by the National Agency jointly with other stakeholders based on substantiated qualification requirements, quality recruitment for the relevant positions, a sufficient supply of resources, and protection against interference

Information about ESR Feedback from the public

Progress in the implementation of measures as of 24.11.2024

All measures of the SACP

measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024

is about to begin to be completed

1 4

Implemented In progress

Display in tabular form

Measures — 5

1.1.4.2.1. Developing and launching master’s degree educational programs (particularly cross-disciplinary ones) with a focus on anticorruption efforts as part of existing specialties and branches of knowledge jointly with partner institutions of higher education

The main implementer: Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine

1.1.4.2.2. Conducting the annual National Anticorruption Forum where anticorruption officers will unveil the best practices, discuss international and domestic practices and challenges in matters of prevention and detection of corruption

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

1.1.4.2.3. Developing specialized online courses for professional development of anticorruption officers, covering the following topics:
1) vetting of draft acts of an agency or organization by the anticorruption officer;
2) management of corruption risks in operations of an agency or organization;
3) exercising powers relating to the protection of whistleblowers and reviewing reports about violations of anticorruption legislation;
4) preventing conflicts of interest and violations of other anticorruption restrictions;
5) conducting an anticorruption background check of contracting parties;
6) disseminating information and raising awareness in matters of compliance with anticorruption legislation;

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

1.1.4.2.4. Ensuring the development of a general short-term professional development program for anticorruption officers based on the key functions of the professional standard titled “Anticorruption Officer”, followed by training

The main implementer: National Agency of Ukraine on Civil Service

1.1.4.2.5. Updating the methodology of evaluation of the performance of anticorruption officers with a focus on evaluating their effectiveness in the priority areas of their work

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

Indicators — 3

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —

0 / 30%

master’s degree educational programs (particularly cross-disciplinary ones) with a focus on anticorruption efforts as part of existing specialties and branches of knowledge have been launched jointly with partner institutions of higher education;

0 / 50%

a system of specialized online courses has been created for professional development of anticorruption officers, covering the following topics:
a) vetting of draft acts of the organization by the anticorruption officer (9 percent);
b) management of corruption risks in the activities of the organization (9 percent);
c) exercising powers relating to the protection of whistleblowers and reviewing reports about violations of anticorruption legislation (9 percent);
d) preventing conflicts of interest and violations of other anticorruption restrictions (9 percent);
e) conducting an anticorruption background check of contracting parties (9 percent);
d) disseminating information and raising awareness in matters of compliance with anticorruption legislation (5 percent).

0 / 20%

The methodology of evaluation of the performance of anticorruption units (anticorruption) officers has been updated with a focus on evaluating their effectiveness in the priority areas of their work (10 percent). According to the results of annual evaluation of anticorruption units (anticorruption officers) for the reporting years, the average indicator of effectiveness of their work in the priority areas is:
a) no less than 65 percent (10 percent);
b) no less than 50 percent (6 percent);
c) no less than 40 percent (2 percent).

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)