Expected strategic result 3.3.4.2. The substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court has been narrowed down through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it

Information about ESR Feedback from the public
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
2
2
Implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 2 ( 100%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 2

3.3.4.2.1. Preparing an analytical report on the feasibility of continued narrowing down of the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it

The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

3.3.4.2.2. Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, coordinators of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community

The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

Indicators — 2

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 50%

An analytical report on the expediency of continued narrowing down of the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it has been prepared and made public.

2
0 / 50%

at least 80 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the legal policy evaluate:
a) the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court as fully optimal or mostly optimal (25 percent);
b) the level of workload of judges of the High Anticorruption Court as optimal or mostly optimal (25 percent).

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)