3.3.4.2.1. Preparing an analytical report on the feasibility of continued narrowing down of the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it
The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
3.3.4.2.2. Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, coordinators of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community
The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
An analytical report on the expediency of continued narrowing down of the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it has been prepared and made public.
at least 80 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the legal policy evaluate:
a) the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court as fully optimal or mostly optimal (25 percent);
b) the level of workload of judges of the High Anticorruption Court as optimal or mostly optimal (25 percent).