Progress in the implementation of measures as of
21.11.2024
5 |
55.6%
2 |
22.2%
1 |
11.1%
1 |
11.1%
9
Implemented
In progress
Not implemented
Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
5 (
55.6%)
Measures —
9
1.1.5.1.1.
Conducting a comprehensive study to identify 10 of the most corruption-plagued sectors (using sociological, analytical, academic, and other sources of information)
The main implementer:
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
1.1.5.1.2.
Conducting a comprehensive study (studies) to identify the most widespread and most economically detrimental corrupt practices in the 10 most corruption-plagued sectors
The main implementer:
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
1.1.5.1.3.
Conducting 10 analytical studies (5 per year) dedicated to:
1) a detailed study of the most widespread or the most economically detrimental corrupt practices and causes of their existence in the 10 most corruption-plagued sectors;
2) finding and modeling the implementation of convenient and legitimate approaches to satisfying the relevant needs of individuals or legal entities as opposed to the existing corrupt practices (particularly by launching electronic services)
The main implementer:
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
1.1.5.1.4.
Annual discussion of the conclusions and recommendations outlined in analytical studies with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, international technical assistance projects, and the academic community
The main implementer:
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
1.1.5.1.5.
Improving the legitimate approaches to satisfying the needs of individuals and legal entities, taking into account the recommendations presented in analytical studies (particularly by launching electronic services, enhancing the transparency and accountability of processes pertaining to interactions between the state and the population and businesses, using re-engineering procedures, as well as implementing technological tools for the elimination of typical corruption risks: modules for random allocation of materials for specific administrative actions, technologies that implement the principle of extraterritorial examination of specific materials and decision-making, artificial intelligence-powered expert systems for aggregation and assessment of big data arrays, etc.)
The main implementer:
Central bodies of executive power, which form or implement state policy in the areas most affected by corruption
1.1.5.1.6.
Supporting the consideration of the Draft Law of Ukraine On the Procedure for Deciding Matters of the Administrative-Territorial System of Ukraine (registration number 4664 dated June 28, 2021) in the Parliament of Ukraine (particularly if the President of Ukraine vetoes the draft law)
The main implementer:
Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine
1.1.5.1.7.
Drafting and supporting the consideration of bylaw normative legal acts needed for implementation of the law mentioned in subclause 1.1.5.1.6
The main implementer:
Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine
1.1.5.1.8.
Aligning normative legal acts with the law indicated in subclause 1.1.5.1.6
The main implementer:
Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine
1.1.5.1.9.
Conducting an analytical study into aligning the system of government agencies and local self-government bodies with the administrative-territorial system, and elaborating recommendations on how to improve the legislation
The main implementer:
Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine
Indicators —
4
Evaluation of achievement of ESR —
indicator weight —
1
Annual reports are published on the findings of analytical studies focusing on replacing corrupt practices in the most corruption-plagued sectors with convenient and legitimate ways of satisfying the needs of individuals and legal entities:
a) in five or more sectors (20 percent);
b) in three - four sectors (15 percent);
c) in one - two sectors (10 percent).
i
2
Improvements have been made to the legitimate ways of satisfying the needs of individuals and legal entities taking into account the recommendations given in the reports indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.1.5.1, with the following considered:
a) 75 percent or more recommendations (40 percent);
b) 50 percent or more recommendations (25 percent);
c) 25 percent or more recommendations (15 percent).
i
3
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures implemented pursuant to subclause 2 of clause 1.1.5.1 as high or very high (20 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures implemented pursuant to subclause 2 of clause 1.1.5.1 as high or very high (10 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures implemented pursuant to subclause 2 of clause 1.1.5.1 as high or very high (5 percent).
i
4
the law has taken effect, which defines:
a) the fundamental principles of the administrative-territorial system of Ukraine (5 percent);
b) the agencies empowered to examine and decide the matters of the administrative-territorial system (5 percent);
c) the procedure for creating, liquidating, establishing and modifying the borders of administrative-territorial units (5 percent);
d) the procedure for naming and renaming administrative-territorial units (5 percent).
i
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)