Expected strategic result 3.3.4.3. The legislation has made it impossible for other courts of first instance and appellate courts to examine cases falling under the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court

A law has taken effect, which:
a) clearly and unambiguously stipulates that the Appeals Chamber of the High Anticorruption Court shall review court decisions of the courts of first instance under the appellate procedure in all criminal proceedings falling under the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court (30 percent);
b) stipulates that only the High Anticorruption Court shall decide the matters involving the enforcement of verdicts handed down by the High Anticorruption Court (35 percent).

at least 80 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the legal policy point out that:
a) the legislation has made it impossible for other courts of first instance and appellate courts to examine cases falling under the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court (10 percent);
b) there have been no cases where other courts have examined proceedings falling under the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court (25 percent).