SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS

ESR: 1.4.2.2. Declarants spend less time when filling out declarations and make fewer mistakes when entering information, particularly owing to the updated declaration form and the ability to automatically migrate specific details from other state registers into the declaration

Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 1 2
4
In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 0 ( 0%)
Download the table
№ Name of the ESR Name of the measure The main implementer Monitoring results (latest) Status % of measures implemented (fully and partially) Evaluation of achievement of ESR Середній рівень ОСР
Direction 1.4. Implementation of financial control measures
0% 0 / 4
0.0%
Problem 1.4.2. The process of submitting information to the Unified State Register of Declarations of Officials Authorized to Carry out Functions of State or Local Self-Government is cumbersome due to insufficient awareness of declarants about the requirements on how to fill out the declarations; Recurrent problems in the operation of this Register, flawed legislation
0% 0 / 4
0.0%
2.1 ОСР 1.4.2.2. Declarants spend less time when filling out declarations and make fewer mistakes when entering information, particularly owing to the updated declaration form and the ability to automatically migrate specific details from other state registers into the declaration 1.4.2.2.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to provide a more detailed wording of the provisions in Article 46 of the Law and optimize the list of information that must be declared National Agency on Corruption Prevention The measure has not been implemented Not implemented
0% 0 / 4
0.0%
2.2 1.4.2.2.2 Ensuring technical compatibility (interoperability) between state (public) electronic registers that includes, inter alia: 1) publishing a plan of implementation of unrealized functionality, eliminating any discrepancies between registers, making changes to subsequent stages of the registers (both user-end changes and business process changes); 2) implementing recommendations regarding the rollout of missing functionality that is prescribed by normative legal acts; 3) unifying the methodology of creation, maintenance, administration, registration, interoperation, and discontinuation of registers; 4) ensuring format-based verification and compatibility of data; 5) using unified directories for all registers, which would make it possible to unify data across registers and subsequently reduce the number of incompatibility incidents; 6) developing and updating detailed documentation pertaining to all components of the register and methods of their interoperation, which would make it possible to optimize the training of employees and reduce the time it takes register improvement and maintenance service providers to become acquainted with the operating principles of the register; 7) creating a directory of errors encountered in each register separately, as not all errors displayed by registers have clear descriptions, which would also make it possible to consider them when migrating to new technologies; 8) improving the legislative framework of each register separately and minimizing the opportunities of manipulations with the “Other” field, given the possibility to compile a clear list of registers that do not contain this field; 9) implementing the procedure of regular analysis of incidents and technical support requests by register users, which would make it possible to clearly formulate the paths of register improvements, implement additional tools for communication between technical administrators and users via email and other channels for reporting errors; 10) migrating data from older electronic registers to existing data registers using a standardized structure of the relevant fields, digitizing hardcopy archives, and entering their data into state registers, while simultaneously ensuring format-based compatibility of data 11) ensuring the population of the core state registers with data. Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine There is progress in the implementation of the measure In progress
2.3 1.4.2.2.3 Conducting a study of the interaction and technical compatibility (interoperability) between the Unified State Register of Declarations of Officials Authorized to Carry out Functions of State or Local Self-Government and other core state registers, which includes: 1) surveying external and internal users of state registers; 2) identifying the causes of insufficient compatibility of the Unified State Register of Declarations of Officials Authorized to Carry out Functions of State or Local Self-Government; 3) formulating recommendations on how to eliminate the detected causes of insufficient compatibility of registers. National Agency on Corruption Prevention Not started
2.4 1.4.2.2.4 Implementing the elements of a system that automatically fills the declaration with specific details by employing the interoperability among state (public) electronic registers of Ukraine National Agency on Corruption Prevention Not started