Progress in the implementation of measures as of
03.02.2025
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
7 (
100%)
Measures —
7
2.1.2.1.1.
Conducting (and publishing the findings of) an analytical study of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criterion of integrity by the High Qualification Commission of Judges, the Public Council on Integrity, and the Public Council of International Experts
The main implementer:
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
2.1.2.1.2.
Conducting (and publishing the findings of) an analytical study of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criterion of integrity by the High Council of Justice
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
2.1.2.1.3.
Conducting and publicizing a comparative analysis of the reports issued by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, and the Public Council of International Experts on the analysis of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criterion of integrity
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
2.1.2.1.4.
Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to grant the High Council of Justice the powers to approve Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators during all procedures of selection and evaluation of judges
The main implementer:
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
2.1.2.1.5.
Drafting the Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators taking into account the best practices identified based on the findings of the analysis of the practices of evaluation by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council of International Experts, and the Public Council on Integrity
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
2.1.2.1.6.
Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft of Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
2.1.2.1.7.
Clearing, approving, and publicizing the revised draft of Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
Indicators —
4
Evaluation of achievement of ESR —
indicator weight —
1
The findings of the analysis of the practice of evaluating judges (candidates for the position of a judge) for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics (in particular, taking into account the relevant judicial practice) have been prepared and published by:
a) the Public Council on Integrity (2.5 percent);
b) the Public Council of International Experts (2.5 percent);
c) the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (2.5 percent);
d) the High Council of Justice (2.5 percent).
2
a law has come into force that provides for the approval of the Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators during all procedures for the selection and evaluation of judges. The qualification assessment procedures should not lead to re-evaluation of those judges who have passed such qualification assessment during the initial qualification assessment, competition or selection procedures
3
Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators:
a) developed by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Integrity Council, based on the best practices identified through the analysis of the practice of assessing the compliance of judges with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, and candidates for the position of judge with the criteria of integrity (9 percent);
b) developed in consultation with the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Integrity Council, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and non-governmental organizations (9 percent);
c) approved (9 percent);
d) published (9 percent);
e) are applied by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Integrity Council (9 percent)
4
At least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that:
а) Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators that are applied in practice fully or mostly take into account the judge's professional profile, as well as all the best practices of preliminary assessment of judges' compliance with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, and candidates for the position of judge - with the integrity criteria of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, and the Public Integrity Council (5 percent);
б) Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators that are applied in practice are comprehensive and cover all necessary aspects (5 percent);
в) Unified judge (candidate for a position of a judge) integrity and professional ethics estimation indicators are systematically applied in the activities of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine, and the Public Integrity Council (5 percent)
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)