2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities

Information about the problem
expected strategic
results 6
measures 11
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 12.09.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.06.2025
2 1 6 2
11
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 3 (27.3%)
Qualitative level of achievement of ESR
1 16.7%
High
0.0%
Middle
5 83.3%
Low
 
Average assessment of achievement of ЕSR, %
16.0
%
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
Expected strategic results
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — evaluation of achievement of ESR, % —
2.1.3.1. The disciplinary body in the justice system, formed on the basis of a competitive selection process held by an independent committee, promptly and fairly considers disciplinary cases against judges
0%
26.0%
Measure
2.1.3.1.1
2.1.3.2. The list and grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability and the kinds of liability have been clarified in a way that allows judges to predict their behavior, in particular, the signs of disciplinary offenses that tarnish the title of judge or undermine the authority of justice have been more clearly defined, and the mechanisms for disciplinary investigation and consideration of disciplinary cases have been improved and simplified
66.7%
0.0%
Measure
2.1.3.2.1 Measure
2.1.3.2.2 Measure
2.1.3.2.3
2.1.3.3. The disciplinary practice with respect to judges is consistent, predictable, stable, and open; all decisions of the disciplinary authority are made public on time; disciplinary proceedings against judges are generally open and broadcast in real time
25%
70.0%
Measure
2.1.3.3.1 Measure
2.1.3.3.2 Measure
2.1.3.3.3 Measure
2.1.3.3.4
2.1.3.4. The grounds and mechanisms for discontinuing disciplinary proceedings have been improved, in particular, a mechanism for discontinuing the disciplinary case against a judge in case of their resignation after the initiation of the disciplinary case against them has been introduced
0%
0.0%
Measure
2.1.3.4.1
2.1.3.5. An effective mechanism has been introduced for verifying the legality of the origin of a judge’s property; judges who have violated the obligation to prove the legality of the source of their property have been dismissed pursuant to Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine
0%
0.0%
Measure
2.1.3.5.1
2.1.3.6. Criminal prosecution mechanisms are not used to exert pressure on judges; the institution of criminal liability of judges for arbitrary abuse of their powers has been introduced
0%
0.0%
Measure
2.1.3.6.1
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)