3.3.2. Poor efficiency and quality of pretrial investigation of corruption and corruption-related criminal offenses (a significant number of such proceedings last for years) is due to excessive complexity of certain procedural formalities

Information about the problem
expected strategic
results 5
measures 26
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 23.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
6 3 7 10
26
Implemented Partially implemented Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 9 ( 34.6%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
Expected strategic results
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
3.3.2.1. The expediency of simplifying the procedures of specific other investigative (detective) activities or other procedural activities, taking into account the standards of respect for human rights and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights has been examined
33.3%
Measure
3.3.2.1.1 Measure
3.3.2.1.2 Measure
3.3.2.1.3
3.3.2.3. The guarantees of institutional and operational independence of the National Anticorruption Bureau and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office are properly defined and implemented in practice, particularly by:
clarifying the legislative provisions on the status of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine within the system of executive authorities (while maintaining the existing guarantees of independence), as well as the entity appointing and dismissing the Director of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine in accordance with the Ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 9-r/2020;
conducting an independent evaluation (audit) of the performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office with the involvement of independent experts
25%
Measure
3.3.2.3.1 Measure
3.3.2.3.2 Measure
3.3.2.3.3 Measure
3.3.2.3.4
3.3.2.4. The National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office are effectively performing their tasks, among other things through:
clarification of legislative provisions on the conclusion of plea agreements in criminal proceedings involving corruption or corruption-related crimes;
ensuring the practical observance of the rules of jurisdiction and holding the prosecutors in breach of such rules accountable;
continued optimization of internal workflows and full-fledged implementation of the electronic criminal proceeding system
100%
Measure
3.3.2.4.1 Measure
3.3.2.4.2
3.3.2.5. Effective cooperation has been established among the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine, the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office, and other government agencies (primarily pretrial investigation authorities, prosecutorial agencies, the National Agency, ARMA, and the State Financial Monitoring Service)
50%
Measure
3.3.2.5.1 Measure
3.3.2.5.2
3.3.2.2. The system of electronic criminal proceedings has been introduced
26.7%
Measure
3.3.2.2.1 Measure
3.3.2.2.2 Measure
3.3.2.2.3 Measure
3.3.2.2.4 Measure
3.3.2.2.5 Measure
3.3.2.2.6 Measure
3.3.2.2.7 (1) Measure
3.3.2.2.7 (2) Measure
3.3.2.2.8 (1) Measure
3.3.2.2.8 (2) Measure
3.3.2.2.8 (3) Measure
3.3.2.2.8 (4) Measure
3.3.2.2.8 (5) Measure
3.3.2.2.8 (6) Measure
3.3.2.2.8 (7)
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)