Measure
2.1.3.2.3. Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.3.2.2 with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community
Measure status:
The measure is aimed at achieving ESR:
2.1.3.2. The list and grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability and the kinds of liability have been clarified in a way that allows judges to predict their behavior, in particular, the signs of disciplinary offenses that tarnish the title of judge or undermine the authority of justice have been more clearly defined, and the mechanisms for disciplinary investigation and consideration of disciplinary cases have been improved and simplified
Problem solving:
2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
Deadlines:
Responsible implementors (authorities):
Sources of funding:
state budget
Volumes of financing (thousand UAH):
within the established budget allocations for the relevant year
Performance indicator:
The conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report have been discussed with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community.
Implementing status
Progress/Result of implementation:
Виконання заходу не розпочато.