Expected strategic result 2.1.2.3. Improvements have been made to the mechanism by which the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine conducts procedures of evaluation of qualifications of judges and competitive selection procedures in order to avoid unjustified delays

Information about ESR Feedback from the public
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 26.12.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
3 1 1 2
7
Implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 3 ( 42.9%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 7

2.1.2.3.1. Developing a draft act that would simplify the procedure of administering examinations and tests, particularly regarding the possibility of evaluation of practical knowledge by specialists hired by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, simplify the scoring based on the results of psychological tests, and so forth

The main implementer: Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine

2.1.2.3.2. Holding a public discussion of the draft act indicated in subclause 2.1.2.3.1, and ensuring its revision (if needed)

The main implementer: Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine

2.1.2.3.3. Approving and publicizing the draft act indicated in subclause 2.1.2.3.1

The main implementer: Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine

2.1.2.3.4. Preparing and publicizing an analytical report on the expediency of continued improvement and simplification of judge selection procedures, evaluation of qualifications of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) with the objective of avoiding unjustified delays

The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

2.1.2.3.5. Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.2.3.4 with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community

The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

2.1.2.3.6. Developing software and deploying hardware needed to create and maintain personal files of judges (personal files of candidates for positions of judges) in electronic form in the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System

The main implementer: State Judicial Administration of Ukraine

2.1.2.3.7. Preparing and approving a regulation governing the procedure of operation of the subsystem designed to create and maintain personal files of judges (personal files of candidates for positions of judges) in electronic form in the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System

The main implementer: High Council of Justice

Indicators — 4

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 40%

Acts of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine contain provisions that simplify the procedure of administering examinations and tests, particularly regarding the possibility of evaluation of practical knowledge by specialists hired by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, simplify the scoring based on the results of psychological tests, and so forth. The qualification evaluation procedures shall not lead to re-evaluation of judges who have passed such qualification evaluation during the initial qualification evaluation procedures, competitive selection or hiring procedures.

2
0 / 15%

An analytical report on the expediency of continued improvement and simplification of judge selection procedures, evaluation of qualifications of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) with the objective of avoiding unjustified delays has been published.

3
0 / 15%

The procedure for creating and maintaining personal files of judges (personal files of candidates for positions of judges) in the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System has been introduced.

4
0 / 30%

at least 80 percent of justice experts evaluate that judge selection procedures do not create preconditions for unjustified delays

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)