Progress in the implementation of measures as of
21.11.2024
2 |
25%
1 |
12.5%
1 |
12.5%
4 |
50%
8
Implemented
Partially implemented
In progress
Not implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
3 (
37.5%)
Measures —
8
2.1.4.2.1.
Preparing and publicizing an analytical report with recommendations on determining the categories of cases that can be examined online irrespective of the location of the parties and the court
The main implementer:
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
2.1.4.2.2.
Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community
The main implementer:
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
2.1.4.2.3.
Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to provide for online judicial examination irrespective of the location of the parties and the court for specific categories of cases, according to the recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.4.2.1
The main implementer:
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
2.1.4.2.4.
Conducting an audit of the current status of information technologies in courts, as well as assessing the degree to which they align with the current tasks of the justice system. The audit should produce an assessment of the current IT solutions in accordance with best international practices and bearing in mind the cost effectiveness of the existing infrastructure, as well as the recommendations regarding the continued development and transformation of the architecture of IT systems of the judiciary.
The main implementer:
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
2.1.4.2.5.
Hiring an independent expert organization to assess the result of the spending of funds on the creation and improvement of services and modules of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System
The main implementer:
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
2.1.4.2.6.
Developing and approving the functional requirements for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System (continued improvement of services and modules)
The main implementer:
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
2.1.4.2.7.
Developing software and deploying hardware required for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System with the involvement of vendors / contractors selected through competitive and transparent public procurement processes (including the expansion of the functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System as mandated by provisions of procedural legislation and to provide courts with IT equipment (server, network, and computer hardware, particularly scanners)
The main implementer:
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
2.1.4.2.8.
Developing and approving the Regulation on the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, which would define the procedure for the operation and usage of all subsystems (modules)
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
Indicators —
4
Evaluation of achievement of ESR —
indicator weight —
1
the analytical report with recommendations on determining the categories of cases that can be examined online irrespective of the location of the parties and the court has been publicized;
2
the law providing for online judicial examination irrespective of the location of the parties and the court for specific categories of cases, according to the recommendations outlined in the analytical report has taken effect;
3
all legislatively prescribed functions of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System have been implemented;
4
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that:
a) online examination of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court in certain categories of cases is used in all categories of cases where it is reasonable and advisable to do so (5 percent);
b) online examination of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court in certain categories of cases is conducted without jeopardizing the rights and legitimate interest of the parties to such proceedings (5 percent);
c) the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System fully performs all of its legislatively prescribed functions (5 percent).
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)