Expected strategic result 2.1.7.3. An effective mechanism for conducting an independent evaluation (audit) of the performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office has been introduced

Information about ESR Feedback from the public
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 1 1
3
Implemented In progress Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 1 ( 33.3%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 3

2.1.7.3.1. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to institute a periodic external independent assessment (audit) of the performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office, which will be carried out by reputed international experts proposed by international and foreign organizations that have provided international technical assistance to Ukraine in matters of preventing and combating corruption

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

2.1.7.3.2. Arranging an external independent assessment (audit) of the performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau and publicizing a report on its findings at intervals prescribed by the law

The main implementer: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine

2.1.7.3.3. Arranging an external independent assessment (audit) of the performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office and publicizing a report on its findings at intervals prescribed by the law

The main implementer: Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine

Indicators — 3

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 50%

A law has taken effect, which stipulates that external independent evaluation (audit) of the performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office carried out by reputed international experts proposed by international and foreign organizations that have provided international technical assistance to Ukraine in matters of preventing and combating corruption, shall be conducted in the month immediately following a period of two years after publication of the findings of the previous evaluation.

2
0 / 40%

In each case prescribed by law, an external independent evaluation (audit) of performance has been conducted in respect of:
a) the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (20 percent);
b) the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (20 percent);

3
0 / 10%

at least 70 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate:
a) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as being impartial and unbiased (2.5. percent);
b) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as being complete and all-encompassing (2.5. percent);
c) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as being impartial and unbiased (2.5. percent);
d) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as being complete and all-encompassing (2.5. percent).

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)