Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 2 1
4
Partially implemented Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 1 ( 25%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 4

3.3.2.3.1. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine draft laws proposing amendments to laws of Ukraine, in particular the Law of Ukraine On the Prosecutor’s Office, which:
1) improve the procedure for competitive selection of the head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office and stipulate that it shall be conducted with the decisive involvement of independent experts appointed by international and foreign organizations that have provided international technical assistance to Ukraine in matters of preventing and combating corruption;
2) stipulate that all powers of the Deputy Prosecutor General – Head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office shall be exercised by the first deputy or deputy in the event of the latter’s absence; the first deputy and deputy head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office are categorized as senior officials of the prosecutorial authorities;
3) clearly establish at the legislative level the amount of salaries of prosecutors at the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office, especially those occupying administrative positions with the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office;
4) provide for the possibility of entering information about an alleged offense committed by a Parliament member of Ukraine by the Deputy Prosecutor General – Head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (acting head) and the head of the Central Detective Office of the National Anticorruption Bureau, as well as the possibility of approval by the Deputy Prosecutor General – Head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (acting head) of motions to be examined by the investigating judge;
5) increase by 300 persons the maximum staff size of the National Anticorruption Bureau (with the enactment of these provisions taking into account the situation that has formed under the legal regime of martial law);
6) create an expert institution for conducting expert examinations in criminal proceedings involving criminal offenses that fall under the jurisdiction of detectives of the National Anticorruption Bureau.

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

3.3.2.3.2. Developing and coordinating the technical requirements for the system of autonomous collection of information from electronic communication networks of providers of electronic communication services

The main implementer: Security Service of Ukraine

3.3.2.3.3. Developing and coordinating the engineering solution for building the system of autonomous collection of information from electronic communication networks of providers of electronic communication services

The main implementer: Security Service of Ukraine

3.3.2.3.4. Implementing the engineering solution and deploying the system of autonomous collection of information from electronic communication networks of providers of electronic communication services

The main implementer: Security Service of Ukraine

Indicators — 3

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 70%

Laws have taken effect, which have amended the laws of Ukraine, including the Law of Ukraine On the Prosecutor’s Office, which:
a) improve the procedure for competitive selection of the head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office and stipulate that it shall be conducted with the decisive involvement of independent experts appointed by international and foreign organizations that have provided international technical assistance to Ukraine in matters of preventing and combating corruption (15 percent);
b) stipulate that all powers of the Deputy Prosecutor General – Head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office shall be exercised by the first deputy or deputy in the event of the latter’s absence; the first deputy and deputy head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office are categorized as senior officials of the prosecutorial authorities (15 percent);
c) clearly establish at the legislative level the amount of salaries of prosecutors at the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office, including those occupying administrative positions with the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (5 percent);
d) provide for the possibility of entering information about an alleged criminal offense committed by a Parliament member of Ukraine by the Deputy Prosecutor General – Head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (acting head) and the head of the Central Detective Office of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine, as well as the possibility of approval by the Deputy Prosecutor General – Head of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (acting head) of motions to be examined by the investigating judge (15 percent);
e) increase by 300 persons the maximum staff size of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (with the enactment of these provisions taking into account the situation that has formed under the legal regime of martial law) (10 percent);
f) create an expert institution for conducting expert examinations in criminal proceedings involving criminal offenses that fall under the jurisdiction of detectives of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (10 percent).

2
0 / 20%

In practice, the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine collects information from electronic communication networks on the conditions of autonomous access, without involving other public authorities in any way.

3
0 / 10%

at least 80 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy:
a) evaluate the actual level of institutional independence of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as very high or high (2.5 percent);
b) evaluate the actual level of operational independence of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as very high or high (2.5 percent);
c) evaluate the actual level of institutional independence of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as very high or high (2.5 percent);
d) evaluate the actual level of operational independence of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as very high or high (2.5 percent).

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)