Expected strategic result 3.3.3.1. The risks of discretion, unpredictability, and ineffectiveness of ARMA’s handling of seized assets have been minimized by introducing a clear regulatory framework for the management of corporate rights, integral property complexes, residential properties, and other types of assets

A law has taken effect, which:
a) details the procedure for appointing the manager of the seized asset, particularly by defining the specific considerations of the application of laws on public procurement in the procedure in question (25 percent);
b) regulates the procedure to be followed by ARMA if the audit of the effectiveness of management of seized assets reveals instances of improper management of assets or attempts by the manager to dispose of the assets (25 percent).

Methodological recommendations on the management of assets seized and transferred to ARMA for management define, in particular, the specifics of transferring corporate rights, integral property complexes, securities, real estate for management and managing them.

at least 80 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy estimate that:
a) the legislative regulation of the procedure for designating the manager and the procedure to be followed by ARMA upon learning about improper management of assets or attempts to dispose of assets by the manager is effective and does not allow for unreasonable discretion of ARMA (10 percent);
b) methodological recommendations on the management of assets seized and transferred to ARMA for management are complete and all-encompassing (10 percent);
c) methodological recommendations on the management of assets seized and transferred to ARMA for management are systematically and properly applied in practice (10 percent).