SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS
Progress in the implementation of measures as of
01.09.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of
30.06.2024
2 |
11.8%
4 |
23.5%
3 |
17.6%
4 |
23.5%
4 |
23.5%
17
ImplementedPartially implementedIn progressNot implementedNot started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
6 (
35.3%)
№
Name of the ESR
Name of the measure
The main implementer
Monitoring results (latest)
Status
% of measures implemented (fully and partially)
Evaluation of achievement of ESR
Середній рівень ОСР
Direction 2.1.
Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities
35.3%
6 /
17
0.0%
Problem 2.1.1.
There is a social trend towards a declining level of trust in the justice system. The law does not define integrity as a qualification requirement for members of the High Council of Justice and the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
0%
0 /
1
0.0%
1.1
ОСР
2.1.1.1.
Integrity has been defined as a mandatory legislative requirement for members of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, and disciplinary authorities in the justice system
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
0%
0 /
1
0.0%
Problem 2.1.2.
Procedures for qualification evaluation of judges and competitive selection procedures need to be improved and clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics should be developed. Integrity and professional ethics as standard requirements for judges are not sufficiently implemented in practice, and the evaluation of conformity to these requirements is not always transparent and predictable
83.3%
5 /
6
0.0%
1.2
ОСР
2.1.2.1.
The High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the High Council of Justice, together with the bodies involved in the assessment, judicial self-government bodies and the public have developed and implemented clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics for the qualification assessment of judges and selection of new judges
ОСР
2.1.2.3.
Improvements have been made to the mechanism by which the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine conducts procedures of evaluation of qualifications of judges and competitive selection procedures in order to avoid unjustified delays
Problem 2.1.3.
Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
0%
0 /
3
0.0%
3.2
ОСР
2.1.3.3.
The disciplinary practice with respect to judges is consistent, predictable, stable, and open; all decisions of the disciplinary authority are made public on time; disciplinary proceedings against judges are generally open and broadcast in real time
Problem 2.1.4.
Presence of corruption risks attributable to gaps and flaws of legislation in the system of justice
14.3%
1 /
7
0.0%
2.8
ОСР
2.1.4.2.
E-justice has been ensured, in particular by enabling the online consideration of certain categories of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court, which, in particular, contributes to the even allocation of cases among courts and judges
ОСР
2.1.4.5.
The regulations on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria have been introduced; the operations of the State Judicial Administration have been audited, particularly in matters of allocation of financial and economic resources for courts and judicial authorities, management of state-owned properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration
ОСР
2.1.4.6.
A network of local courts has been reviewed and created, taking into account the administrative-territorial reform, the need to ensure direct access to justice, and economic feasibility