Measure
2.2.4.1.1.
Arranging an analytical study followed by the issuance of conclusions and recommendations to government agencies, focused on the study, analysis, and consolidation of:
1) the nomenclature of—and structural and content requirements for—analytical and consultative documents of European Union institutions with a focus on the prospects of harmonization with these institutions of the nomenclature of—and structural and content requirements for—analytical and consultative documents used by entities responsible for shaping the government policy in the relevant sector in Ukraine;
2) the actual informational needs of entities responsible for shaping the government policy in the relevant sector in Ukraine and the prospects of such needs being met, including through improvements of the system for gathering, analyzing, consolidating, and accessing statistical data;
3) the practices of European Union institutions pertaining to consultations with stakeholders.
Measure status:
Actual execution date:
31.03.2024
The measure is aimed at achieving ESR:
2.2.4.1. The legislative and executive branches of government have introduced a structured and effective policy analysis process in their decision-making procedures as part of state policymaking, continued systemic analysis of market regulation and implementation of recommendations based on its findings
Problem solving:
2.2.4. Ineffective government regulation, which hinders the growth of honest businesses and fosters corrupt practices
Deadlines:
Responsible implementors (authorities):
Sources of funding:
state budget and/or international technical assistance funds
Volumes of financing (thousand UAH):
within the established budget allocations for the relevant year and/or within the limits of international technical funds
Performance indicator:
The analytical study has been conducted, with conclusions and recommendations issued to government agencies.
Implementing status
Progress/Result of implementation:
The analytical study aimed at improving decision-making procedures in the area of state policy-making in the legislative and executive branches was conducted and conclusions and recommendations were provided to the public authorities.
The key circumstances that prevented the timely implementation of the measure were
- the complexity and breadth of the research subject;
- a significant amount of regulatory and empirical material that had to be analysed, compared and summarised;
- the difficulty of engaging external experts to participate in the study.
Due to this, the National Agency of Ukraine on Civil Service approached the National Agency on Corruption Prevention with a proposal to postpone the implementation of the task for six months.