2.2.5. Insufficient information about the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the fact that it is vested with a number of discretionary powers complicate public control over its activities and cause a high level of corruption risks. There is no effective program to mitigate the liability of cartel members who have reported the cartel and provided evidence.

Information about the problem
expected strategic
results 4
measures 4
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
4
4
Partially implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 4 ( 100%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
Expected strategic results
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
2.2.5.1. The Antimonopoly Committee operates according to the principles of transparency, predictability, and legal certainty; the level of corruption risks in its activities has significantly decreased owing to unimpeded but regulated public access to discussions at the stage of announcement of decisions, draft regulations, plans and results of the Antimonopoly Committee’s activities
100%
Measure
2.2.5.1.1
2.2.5.2. The legislation obligates the Antimonopoly Committee to publish on its official website:
recommendations issued to government agencies, local self-government bodies, organizations, business entities, associations;
the complete list of cases being examined by the Antimonopoly Committee along with the regularly updated details of each case involving a violation of the requirements of legislation on the protection of economic competition, specifically the gist of the case, the general stages of examination
100%
Measure
2.2.5.2.1
2.2.5.3. The excessive level of discretion in the exercise of powers by the Antimonopoly Committee has been eliminated, in particular when it comes to determining:
the commencement of examination of a case involving a violation of the requirements of legislation on the protection of economic competition, the estimated timeframe for consideration of such a case and, if necessary, the possibility of extending this timeframe with appropriate justification;
the timeframe for verifying information about illegally obtained government aid;
ways to improve the mechanism for appointing and replacing state commissioners responsible for examining cases involving violations of the legislation on protection of economic competition, taking into account their professional qualities, experience, impartiality, independence, legality and validity of their decisions;
ways to improve approaches to determining the amount of the fine and the procedure for calculating the fine imposed for violations of the legislation on protection of economic competition
100%
Measure
2.2.5.3.1
2.2.5.4. To encourage disclosure of cartels, the mechanism of exemption or mitigation of liability of cartel members who report the cartel to the Antimonopoly Committee and provide relevant evidence has been improved on the basis of best practices of the European Union
100%
Measure
2.2.5.4.1
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)