Direction 2.1.
Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities
11.1%
3 /
27
0.0%
Problem 2.1.4.
Presence of corruption risks attributable to gaps and flaws of legislation in the system of justice
11.1%
3 /
27
0.0%
1.1
ОСР
2.1.4.1.
Mechanisms have been introduced to prevent the same person from holding an administrative position in a court for a long time
2.1.4.1.1 Preparing and publicizing an analytical report on the findings of the study of cases where administrative positions in courts have been filled by the same person for more than two terms of office in a row, with recommendations on how to deal with such cases and make their recurrence impossible
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
Not started
0%
0 /
2
0.0%
1.2
2.1.4.1.2 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to improve the procedure for electing judges to administrative positions and dismissing them from these positions in order to make it impossible for the same person to hold the same administrative position in courts for a long period of time, according to the recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.4.1.1
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
Not started
2.1
ОСР
2.1.4.2.
E-justice has been ensured, in particular by enabling the online consideration of certain categories of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court, which, in particular, contributes to the even allocation of cases among courts and judges
2.1.4.2.1 Preparing and publicizing an analytical report with recommendations on determining the categories of cases that can be examined online irrespective of the location of the parties and the court
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
25%
2 /
8
0.0%
2.2
2.1.4.2.2 Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
2.3
2.1.4.2.3 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to provide for online judicial examination irrespective of the location of the parties and the court for specific categories of cases, according to the recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.4.2.1
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started
2.4
2.1.4.2.4 Conducting an audit of the current status of information technologies in courts, as well as assessing the degree to which they align with the current tasks of the justice system. The audit should produce an assessment of the current IT solutions in accordance with best international practices and bearing in mind the cost effectiveness of the existing infrastructure, as well as the recommendations regarding the continued development and transformation of the architecture of IT systems of the judiciary.
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
The measure has not been implemented
Not implemented
2.5
2.1.4.2.5 Hiring an independent expert organization to assess the result of the spending of funds on the creation and improvement of services and modules of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
The measure has not been implemented
Not implemented
2.6
2.1.4.2.6 Developing and approving the functional requirements for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System (continued improvement of services and modules)
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
The measure has not been implemented
Not implemented
2.7
2.1.4.2.7 Developing software and deploying hardware required for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System with the involvement of vendors / contractors selected through competitive and transparent public procurement processes (including the expansion of the functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System as mandated by provisions of procedural legislation and to provide courts with IT equipment (server, network, and computer hardware, particularly scanners)
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
Implementation of the measure was started late
In progress
2.8
2.1.4.2.8 Developing and approving the Regulation on the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, which would define the procedure for the operation and usage of all subsystems (modules)
High Council of Justice
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started
3.1
ОСР
2.1.4.3.
The scope of application of methods of alternative dispute resolution and pretrial settlement of disputes has been expanded
2.1.4.3.1 Supporting the consideration of the Draft Law of Ukraine On Amendments to Select Laws of Ukraine Towards the Improvement of the Procedure for Creating and Operating Arbitration Courts with the Objective of Restoring Trust in Arbitration Proceedings (registration number 3411 dated April 29, 2020) (particularly if the President of Ukraine vetoes the draft law)
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started
0%
0 /
2
0.0%
3.2
2.1.4.3.2 Supporting the consideration of the Draft Law of Ukraine On Amendments to Select Legislative Acts of Ukraine Towards the Improvement of Operations of Arbitration Courts (registration number 5347 dated April 8, 2021) in the Parliament of Ukraine (particularly if the President of Ukraine vetoes the draft law)
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started
4.1
ОСР
2.1.4.4.
The system of enforcement of court decisions has been improved
2.1.4.4.1 Supporting the consideration of the Draft Law of Ukraine On Enforcement of Decisions (registration number 5660 dated June 14, 2021) in the Parliament of Ukraine (particularly if the President of Ukraine vetoes the draft law)
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
There is no progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
0%
0 /
5
0.0%
4.2
2.1.4.4.2 Ensuring the connection of banks to the automated system of enforcement proceedings to enable information exchange and ensure automated freezing of funds in accounts of debtors
State Enterprise "National Information Systems"
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
4.3
2.1.4.4.3 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that:
1) implements efficient and effective judicial control over the enforcement of court decisions;
2) implements effective procedures for determining or changing the method or procedure of enforcement of decisions unrelated to property;
3) improves the procedure of enforcement of decisions that obligate the debtor to act or refrain from acting in a certain way;
4) revises and revokes unjustified moratoriums on the enforcement of decisions in which state-owned enterprises are named as debtors;
5) improves the procedure for enforcement of decisions of international arbitration courts in Ukraine.
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
4.4
2.1.4.4.4 Implementing a Unified State Register of Enforcement Documents taking into account the architecture requirements for subsequent application of data array technologies
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
The measure has not been implemented
Not implemented
4.5
2.1.4.4.5 Ensuring the data exchange and interoperability between the Automated System of Enforcement Proceedings and the Unified State Register of Enforcement Documents
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started
5.1
ОСР
2.1.4.5.
The regulations on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria have been introduced; the operations of the State Judicial Administration have been audited, particularly in matters of allocation of financial and economic resources for courts and judicial authorities, management of state-owned properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration
2.1.4.5.1 Conducting activities of state external financial control (audit) over the spending of state budget funds on the administration of justice by local courts and courts of appeal and the functioning of agencies and institutions of the justice system, including in matters of the allocation of financial and economic resources for courts and judicial authorities, management of state-owned properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration (SJA), supporting the creation and operation of specific subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System
Accounting Chamber of Ukraine
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
14.3%
1 /
7
0.0%
5.2
2.1.4.5.2 Drafting standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
The measure was implemented on time, but partially
Partially implemented
5.3
2.1.4.5.3 Holding consultations on the draft standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the State Judicial Administration, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, judges, NGOs, international organizations, and participants of international technical assistance projects; obtaining expert opinions
High Council of Justice
Implementation of the measure has started on time
In progress
5.4
2.1.4.5.4 Revising and approving the standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts, and publicizing them
High Council of Justice
Not started
5.5
2.1.4.5.5 Drafting the Regulation on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria, particularly taking into account the standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
Not started
5.6
2.1.4.5.6 Holding consultations on the draft Regulation on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the State Judicial Administration, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, judges, NGOs, international organizations, and participants of international technical assistance projects; obtaining expert opinions
High Council of Justice
Not started
5.7
2.1.4.5.7 Revising and approving the Regulation on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria, and publicizing it
High Council of Justice
Not started
6.1
ОСР
2.1.4.6.
A network of local courts has been reviewed and created, taking into account the administrative-territorial reform, the need to ensure direct access to justice, and economic feasibility
2.1.4.6.1 Preparing and publicizing an analytical report on the needs of creation, reorganization, or liquidation of local courts, taking into account the changes to the administrative-territorial system, the need to ensure access to justice and optimize state budget spending
High Council of Justice
Implementation of the measure has started on time
In progress
0%
0 /
3
0.0%
6.2
2.1.4.6.2 Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community
High Council of Justice
Not started
6.3
2.1.4.6.3 Drafting laws on the creation, reorganization, or liquidation of local courts, taking into account the recommendations given in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.4.6.1
President of Ukraine
Not started