2.1.4. Presence of corruption risks attributable to gaps and flaws of legislation in the system of justice

Information about the problem
expected strategic
results 7
measures 27
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 18.09.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.06.2025
3 4 8 2 10
27
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 7 (25.9%)
Qualitative level of achievement of ESR
1 1 14.3%
High
0.0%
Middle
6 85.7%
Low
 
Average evaluation of achievement of ESR, %
18.1
%
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
Expected strategic results
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — evaluation of achievement of ESR, % —
2.1.4.1. Mechanisms have been introduced to prevent the same person from holding an administrative position in a court for a long time
0%
0.0%
Measure
2.1.4.1.1 Measure
2.1.4.1.2
2.1.4.2. E-justice has been ensured, in particular by enabling the online consideration of certain categories of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court, which, in particular, contributes to the even allocation of cases among courts and judges
50%
10.0%
Measure
2.1.4.2.1 Measure
2.1.4.2.2 Measure
2.1.4.2.3 Measure
2.1.4.2.4 Measure
2.1.4.2.5 Measure
2.1.4.2.6 Measure
2.1.4.2.7 Measure
2.1.4.2.8
2.1.4.3. The scope of application of methods of alternative dispute resolution and pretrial settlement of disputes has been expanded
0%
0.0%
Measure
2.1.4.3.1 Measure
2.1.4.3.2
2.1.4.4. The system of enforcement of court decisions has been improved
20%
7.0%
Measure
2.1.4.4.1 Measure
2.1.4.4.2 Measure
2.1.4.4.3 Measure
2.1.4.4.4 Measure
2.1.4.4.5
2.1.4.5. The regulations on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria have been introduced; the operations of the State Judicial Administration have been audited, particularly in matters of allocation of financial and economic resources for courts and judicial authorities, management of state-owned properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration
28.6%
10.0%
Measure
2.1.4.5.1 Measure
2.1.4.5.2 Measure
2.1.4.5.3 Measure
2.1.4.5.4 Measure
2.1.4.5.5 Measure
2.1.4.5.6 Measure
2.1.4.5.7
2.1.4.6. A network of local courts has been reviewed and created, taking into account the administrative-territorial reform, the need to ensure direct access to justice, and economic feasibility
0%
0.0%
Measure
2.1.4.6.1 Measure
2.1.4.6.2 Measure
2.1.4.6.3
2.1.4.7. The amount of the remuneration of judges provided for by the Law of Ukraine On the Judicial System and Status of Judges is not limited by other normative legal acts
0%
100%
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)