2.1.2. Procedures for qualification evaluation of judges and competitive selection procedures need to be improved and clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics should be developed. Integrity and professional ethics as standard requirements for judges are not sufficiently implemented in practice, and the evaluation of conformity to these requirements is not always transparent and predictable

Information about the problem
expected strategic
results 4
measures 23
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 03.02.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
13 1 4 2 3
23
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 14 ( 60.9%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
Expected strategic results
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
2.1.2.1. The High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the High Council of Justice, together with the bodies involved in the assessment, judicial self-government bodies and the public have developed and implemented clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics for the qualification assessment of judges and selection of new judges
100%
Measure
2.1.2.1.1 Measure
2.1.2.1.2 Measure
2.1.2.1.3 Measure
2.1.2.1.4 Measure
2.1.2.1.5 Measure
2.1.2.1.6 Measure
2.1.2.1.7
2.1.2.2. Improvements have been made to the mechanism of evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criteria (indicators) of integrity as part of procedures to select and appoint new judges with the involvement of the Public Council on Integrity
0%
Measure
2.1.2.2.1 Measure
2.1.2.2.2
2.1.2.3. Improvements have been made to the mechanism by which the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine conducts procedures of evaluation of qualifications of judges and competitive selection procedures in order to avoid unjustified delays
42.9%
Measure
2.1.2.3.1 Measure
2.1.2.3.2 Measure
2.1.2.3.3 Measure
2.1.2.3.4 Measure
2.1.2.3.5 Measure
2.1.2.3.6 Measure
2.1.2.3.7
2.1.2.4. An objective and transparent methodology for scoring and determining the results by members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and the High Council of Justice when making decisions in the selection, evaluation, and promotion of judges, as well as for publishing information on the examinations, has been introduced
57.1%
Measure
2.1.2.4.1 Measure
2.1.2.4.2 Measure
2.1.2.4.3 Measure
2.1.2.4.4 Measure
2.1.2.4.5 Measure
2.1.2.4.6 Measure
2.1.2.4.7
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)